WALLAROO’S THROTTLE & STRANGLE RULES

XXIII. Though it be lawful to hold any player in a maul, this holding does not include attempts to throttle or strangle, which are totally opposed to all the principles of the game.
early 1800s football at Rugby School
Adopting “Rugby Union” rules 1874

* See in London’s The Times newspaper in an article “The Evolution of Football” on January 30, 1953 (pg. 10) and a letter in The Spectator weekly of December 25, 1953 (pg. 17).

** In the Blackheath FC rules of 1862 the term “scrummage” was used for the same feature of the game that Wallaroo 1871 and Rugby School 1858 rules called a “maul” viz., “10. Though it is lawful to hold a player in a scrummage, this does not include attempts to throttle or strangle, which are totally opposed to the principles of the game.” See as well “Maul outside goal-line” in the Definitions above, which also describes a “scrimmage” (as distinct from a “scrummage”). Today’s scrums and rucks are descendants of the “scrimmage”, whereas the “scrummage” was/is a maul.

*** For example, while Rule XXIII speaks of not allowing throttling and strangling in mauls, it doesn’t mean manslaughter may (or did) freely occur elsewhere across the rugby field. But if you must look at it with the eye of a lawyer, Rule XXII deals with conduct outside of mauls, and Rule XXIII does go on to state that throttling and strangling “are totally opposed to all the principles of the game”.

WallarooFC1870.com – All website text & content © Sean Fagan